We're headed to define the biology, but we have not yet done and that we move slowly, carefully, because the language is important. So soon included in our selection of Michel Foucault's book entitled "Les Mots et les Choses." Interestingly, he is a philosopher, who tells us, at least, it is not biology. When he says
They love to stories of biology in the eighteenth century, but warns that biology does not exist ....
Or:
If Tournefort natural history, Linnaeus and Buffon is related to something other than itself, it is not the biology, comparative anatomy of Cuvier or the evolution of Darwin, but with grammar Bauzée general, the analysis of money and wealth as in Law, Veron of Fortbonnais or Turgot.
the author corrects the widely held view among a crowd of teachers and researchers in biology who, in his books and lectures, the idea spread that any approach to the study of nature is biology. Nothing is more erroneous.
The text of Foucault helps us resolve our doubts. Us closer to a definition of biology and, above all, demands, like those of other contemporary philosophers, who ciñamos our language to reality, that when we speak or write, we do about the real world and not about fantasies or assumptions. For example, in his book on the language of Nietzsche, entitled "Dionisio asleep on a tiger" (Essays / Fate 1993), Henry Lynch says
Major support systems of the past, think of Nietzsche background in primacy of the literal about what figuratively, and presupposes the literal correspondence between the world of names and the world of things
They love to stories of biology in the eighteenth century, but warns that biology does not exist ....
Or:
If Tournefort natural history, Linnaeus and Buffon is related to something other than itself, it is not the biology, comparative anatomy of Cuvier or the evolution of Darwin, but with grammar Bauzée general, the analysis of money and wealth as in Law, Veron of Fortbonnais or Turgot.
the author corrects the widely held view among a crowd of teachers and researchers in biology who, in his books and lectures, the idea spread that any approach to the study of nature is biology. Nothing is more erroneous.
The text of Foucault helps us resolve our doubts. Us closer to a definition of biology and, above all, demands, like those of other contemporary philosophers, who ciñamos our language to reality, that when we speak or write, we do about the real world and not about fantasies or assumptions. For example, in his book on the language of Nietzsche, entitled "Dionisio asleep on a tiger" (Essays / Fate 1993), Henry Lynch says
Major support systems of the past, think of Nietzsche background in primacy of the literal about what figuratively, and presupposes the literal correspondence between the world of names and the world of things
have to look forever, without rest, the fundamental correspondence between names and things that claim to the title treaty Foucault ("Les Mots et les Choses") subtitle: An Archaeology of knowledge.
Jump to:
End of prologue open
0 comments:
Post a Comment