Under Baradacco model, the dilemma facing the Eni group at this level affects people found within the organization, as well as people who are outside of the organization.
That is, the important decisions taken by the company concerned and whether directly or indirectly to different social groups. With the unfair act of bribery, it became apparent poor decision making which affected the company officials, either on the bad image they project of the organization and the optimal development of the activities of the company. In addition, another group that is subject to this are the residents of the communities, since the projects were accepted by officials for bribery only, without taking into account other factors that are important to the community.
also Baradacco extracted three questions for the management of these above organizational dilemmas:
Have I done everything I could to secure my position and affirm the strength of my organization?
Here Marzoccci Lorenzo has not ensured the correct position the company has been kept. Because this company should be governed according to certain regulations, which has been that employees have done what they wanted based on their economic desirability. Demonstrating that the organization has a firm and its activities, ie, do not follow proper procedures to get to meet their objectives and Responsibility to society.
Have I done everything possible to think creatively about the role of my institution with respect to society and constituents?
were not taken into account the consequences of acts that would take some executives of the company, bypassing the constituents, who to have a lower degree of power are not taken into account the extent to which it affected. Also, senior managers should use creativity to make wise decisions at every predicament that is presented in the company.
In this situation I have to play the lion-leadership, Ispir, emblematic, or the fox - cunning and sagacity?
In this situation, senior management of this company took the image of the fox, where they thought to be more cunning to commit such acts. Not taking into account that some day the truth would come out to light and giving it to know the groups affected by those decisions unethical. That is why, rather that the company should take the role of the lion, which is inspiring for the rest of the employees of this company feel safe to work in an organization who demonstrates a positive image in society.
vs Under the correct analysis. can be analyzed properly with the dilemma in which ENI group was found in the following way:
0 comments:
Post a Comment